Unplanned hospital readmission after cranial neurosurgery

Unplanned hospital readmission after cranial neurosurgery

Many readmissions may be preventable and occur at predictable time intervals. The causes and timing of readmission vary significantly across neurosurgical subgroups. Future studies should focus on detecting specific complications in select cohorts at predefined time points, which may allow for interventions to lower costs and reduce patient morbidity 1).


Hospital readmission to a hospital (non-index) other than the one from which patients received their original care (index) has been associated with increases in both morbidity and mortality for cancer patients.

Of patient readmissions following brain tumor resection, 15.6% occur at a non-index facility. Low procedure volume is a confounder for non-index analysis and is associated with an increased likelihood of major complications and mortality, as compared to readmission to high-procedure-volume hospitals. Further studies should evaluate interventions targeting factors associated with unplanned readmission 2).


In a single-center Canadian experience. Almost one-fifth of neurosurgical patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. However, only about half of these patients were admitted for an unplanned reason, and only 10% of all readmissions were potentially avoidable. This study demonstrates unique challenges encountered in a publicly funded healthcare setting and supports the growing literature suggesting 30-day readmission rates may serve as an inappropriate quality of care metric in neurosurgical patients. Potentially avoidable readmissions can be predicted, and further research assessing predictors of avoidable readmissions is warranted 3).

A study of Elsamadicy et al. suggested that infection, altered mental status, and new sensory/motor deficits were the primary complications leading to unplanned 30-day readmission after cranial neurosurgery 4).


The preponderance of postdischarge mortality and complications requiring readmission highlights the importance of posthospitalization management 5).


Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is known to be associated with negative outcomes and is underdiagnosed. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a screening tool for OSA that has been validated in both medical and surgical populations. Given that readmission, after surgical intervention is an undesirable event, Caplan et al. sought to investigate, among patients not previously diagnosed with OSA, the capacity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire to predict 30-day readmissions following craniotomy for a supratentorial tumor.

For patients undergoing craniotomy for treatment of a supratentorial neoplasm within a multiple-hospital academic medical center, data were captured in a prospective manner via the Neurosurgery Quality Improvement Initiative (NQII) EpiLog tool. Data were collected over a 1-year period for all supratentorial craniotomy cases. An additional criterion for study inclusion was that the patient was alive at 30 postoperative days. Statistical analysis consisted of simple logistic regression, which assessed the ability of the STOP-Bang questionnaire and additional variables to effectively predict outcomes such as 30-day readmission, 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, and 30-day reoperation. The C-statistic was used to represent the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which analyzes the discrimination of a variable or model.

Included in the sample were all admissions for supratentorial neoplasms treated with craniotomy (352 patients), 49.72% (n = 175) of which were female. The average STOP-Bang score was 1.91 ± 1.22 (range 0-7). A 1-unit higher STOP-Bang score accurately predicted 30-day readmissions (OR 1.31, p = 0.017) and 30-day ED visits (OR 1.36, p = 0.016) with fair accuracy as confirmed by the ROC curve (C-statistic 0.60-0.61). The STOP-Bang questionnaire did not correlate with 30-day reoperation (p = 0.805) or home discharge (p = 0.315).

The results of this study suggest that undiagnosed OSA, as assessed via the STOP-Bang questionnaire, is a significant predictor of patient health status and readmission risk in the brain tumor craniotomy population. Further investigations should be undertaken to apply this prediction tool in order to enhance postoperative patient care to reduce the need for unplanned readmissions 6).


Lopez Ramos et al., from the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, examined clinical risk factors and postoperative complications associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions after cranial neurosurgery.

They queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011-2016 for adult patients that underwent a cranial neurosurgical procedure. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards model selection was used to determine predictors associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission.

Of 40,802 cranial neurosurgical cases, 4,147 (10.2%) had an unplanned readmission. Postoperative complications were higher in the readmission cohort (18.5% vs 9.9%, p <0.001). On adjusted analysis, clinical factors predictive of unplanned readmission included hypertension, COPD, diabetes, coagulopathy, chronic steroid use, and preoperative anemia, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia (all p ≤ 0.01). Higher ASA class (III-V), operative time >216 minutes, and unplanned reoperation were also associated with an increased likelihood of readmission (all p ≤0.001). Postoperative complications predictive of unplanned readmissions were wound infection (OR 4.90, p <0.001), pulmonary embolus (OR 3.94, p <0.001), myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest (OR 2.37, p <0.001), sepsis (OR 1.73, p <0.001), deep venous thrombosis (1.50, p=0.002), and urinary tract infection (OR 1.45, p=0.002). Female sex, transfer status, and postoperative pulmonary complications were protective of readmission (all p <0.05)

Unplanned hospital readmission after cranial neurosurgery is a common event. Identification of high-risk patients who undergo cranial procedures may allow hospitals to reduce unplanned readmissions and associated healthcare costs 7).


Cusimano et al., conducted a systematic review of several databases; a manual search of the Journal of NeurosurgeryNeurosurgeryActa NeurochirurgicaCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences; and the cited references of the selected articles. Quality review was performed using the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

A total of 1344 articles published between 1947 and 2015 were identified; 25 were considered potentially eligible, of which 12 met inclusion criteria. The 30-day readmission rates varied from 6.9% to 23.89%. Complications arising during or after neurosurgical procedures were a prime reason for readmission. Race, comorbidities, and longer hospital stay put patients at risk for readmission.

Although readmission may be an important indicator for good care for the subset of acutely declining patients, neurosurgery should aim to reduce 30-day readmission rates with improved quality of care through systemic changes in the care of neurosurgical patients that promote preventive measures 8).

References

1)

Taylor BE, Youngerman BE, Goldstein H, Kabat DH, Appelboom G, Gold WE, Connolly ES Jr. Causes and Timing of Unplanned Early Readmission After Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):356-69. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001110. PubMed PMID: 26562821.
2)

Jarvis CA, Bakhsheshian J, Ding L, Wen T, Tang AM, Yuan E, Giannotta SL, Mack WJ, Attenello FJ. Increased complication and mortality among non-index hospital readmissions after brain tumor resection is associated with low-volume readmitting hospitals. J Neurosurg. 2019 Oct 4:1-13. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.JNS183469. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31585421.
3)

Wilson MP, Jack AS, Nataraj A, Chow M. Thirty-day readmission rate as a surrogate marker for quality of care in neurosurgical patients: a single-center Canadian experience. J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul 1:1-7. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.JNS172962. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29979117.
4)

Elsamadicy AA, Sergesketter A, Adogwa O, Ongele M, Gottfried ON. Complications and 30-Day readmission rates after craniotomy/craniectomy: A single Institutional study of 243 consecutive patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jan;47:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Oct 12. PubMed PMID: 29031542.
5)

Dasenbrock HH, Yan SC, Smith TR, Valdes PA, Gormley WB, Claus EB, Dunn IF. Readmission After Craniotomy for Tumor: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;80(4):551-562. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw062. PubMed PMID: 28362921.
6)

Caplan IF, Glauser G, Goodrich S, Chen HI, Lucas TH, Lee JYK, McClintock SD, Malhotra NR. Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea as a predictor of 30-day readmission for brain tumor patients. J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul 19:1-6. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.JNS1968. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31323636.
7)

Lopez Ramos C, Brandel MG, Rennert RC, Wali AR, Steinberg JA, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Burton BN, Pannell JS, Olson SE, Khalessi AA. Clinical Risk Factors and Postoperative Complications Associated with Unplanned Hospital Readmissions After Cranial Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul 24. pii: S1878-8750(18)31614-0. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.136. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30053566.
8)

Cusimano MD, Pshonyak I, Lee MY, Ilie G. A systematic review of 30-day readmission after cranial neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):342-352. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS152226. Epub 2016 Oct 21. PubMed PMID: 27767396.

Polymicrogyria

Polymicrogyria

Small gyri with shallow sulci.

Epidemiology

The prevalence of isolated polymicrogyria is unknown. Researchers believe that it may be relatively common overall, although the individual forms of the disorder (such as bilateral generalized polymicrogyria) are probably rare.

Classification

The mildest form is known as unilateral focal polymicrogyria. This form of the condition affects a relatively small area on one side of the brain. It may cause minor neurological problems, such as mild seizures that can be easily controlled with medication. Some people with unilateral focal polymicrogyria do not have any problems associated with the condition.

Bilateral forms of polymicrogyria tend to cause more severe neurological problems. Signs and symptoms of these conditions can include recurrent seizures (epilepsy), delayed development, crossed eyes, problems with speech and swallowing, and muscle weakness or paralysis. The most severe form of the disorder, bilateral generalized polymicrogyria, affects the entire brain. This condition causes severe intellectual disability, problems with movement, and seizures that are difficult or impossible to control with medication.

Etiology

Gene abnormalities e.g. WDR62 and PIK3R2

Intrauterine cerebral injury, after approximately 20 weeks gestation, e.g. infection such as CMV, or hypoxia-ischemia

Metabolic etiology e.g. peroxisomal disorders.

Isolated polymicrogyria can have different inheritance patterns. Several forms of the condition, including bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria (which is associated with mutations in the ADGRG1 gene), have an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. In autosomal recessive inheritance, both copies of the gene in each cell have mutations. The parents of an individual with an autosomal recessive condition each carry one copy of the mutated gene, but they typically do not show signs and symptoms of the condition.

Polymicrogyria can also have an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, which means one copy of the altered gene in each cell is sufficient to cause the disorder. Other forms of polymicrogyria appear to have an X-linked pattern of inheritance. Genes associated with X-linked conditions are located on the X chromosome, which is one of the two sex chromosomes. A characteristic of X-linked inheritance is that fathers cannot pass X-linked traits to their sons.

Some people with polymicrogyria have relatives with the disorder, while other affected individuals have no family history of the condition. When an individual is the only affected person in his or her family, it can be difficult to determine the cause and possible inheritance pattern of the disorder.


Proteins anchored to the cell surface via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) play various key roles in the human body, particularly in development and neurogenesis. As such, many developmental disorders are caused by mutations in genes involved in the GPI biosynthesis and remodeling pathway.

Murakami et al. described ten unrelated families with biallelic mutations in PIGB, a gene that encodes phosphatidylinositol glycan class B, which transfers the third mannose to the GPI. Ten different PIGB variants were found in these individuals. Flow cytometric analysis of blood cells and fibroblasts from the affected individuals showed decreased cell surface presence of GPI-anchored proteins. Most of the affected individuals have global developmental and/or intellectual delay, all had seizures, two had polymicrogyria, and four had peripheral neuropathy. Eight children passed away before four years old. Two of them had a clinical diagnosis of DOORS syndrome (deafness, onychodystrophy, osteodystrophy, mental retardation, and seizures), a condition that includes sensorineural deafness, shortened terminal phalanges with small finger and toenails, intellectual disability, and seizures; this condition overlaps with the severe phenotypes associated with inherited GPI deficiency. Most individuals tested showed elevated alkaline phosphatase, which is a characteristic of the inherited GPI deficiency but not DOORS syndrome. It is notable that two severely affected individuals showed 2-oxoglutaric aciduria, which can be seen in DOORS syndrome, suggesting that severe cases of inherited GPI deficiency and DOORS syndrome might share some molecular pathway disruptions 1).

Associations

Polymicrogyria most often occurs as an isolated feature, although it can occur with other brain abnormalities. It is also a feature of several genetic syndromes characterized by intellectual disability and multiple birth defects. These include 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, Adams-Oliver syndromeAicardi syndromeGalloway-Mowat syndromeJoubert syndromeZellweger syndrome.

Megalencephaly-capillary malformation syndrome (MCAP).

Schizencephaly.

Diagnosis

May be difficult to diagnose by CT/MRI, and may be confused with pachygyria.

Treatment

Polymicrogyria (PMG), although the most common brain malformation, represents a low percentage among patients operated on for epilepsy. In cases of hemispheric PMG, electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep (ESESS) may occur leading to an aggravation of the neurological condition and risk of drug resistance. In such cases, surgical treatment can be offered.

Case series

From a population of 230 children who underwent hemispherotomy for epilepsy in the Rothschild Foundation Hospital Fohlen et al. retrospectively reviewed the patients with unilateral PMG and drug-resistant electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep (ESESS) focusing on clinical charts, electrophysiological data, and post-surgical outcome.

Eighteen patients were operated on at a mean age of 7.2 years. The average age was 2 years at seizure onset and 4.4 years at diagnosis of ESESS. All the patients preoperatively had some degree of developmental delay associated with hemiparesis. During ESESS all of them evidenced a cognitive decline and eight experienced a worsening of the hemiparesis; ESESS was resistant to at least three antiepileptic drugs. The outcome of epilepsy, with a mean follow-up of 12.8 years showed that ESESS disappeared in all patients while 16 of 18 became seizure-free. Improvement of behavior and cognitive condition was observed in all.

Hemispherotomy can be helpful in patients with drug-resistant ESESS and hemispheric PMG while keeping in mind that more often an accurate medical treatment can be sufficient. The main benefit of surgery is to definitively stop the seizures and to withdraw the medical treatment while keeping in mind the risk of motor aggravation 2).

References

1)

Murakami Y, Nguyen TTM, Baratang N, Raju PK, Knaus A, Ellard S, Jones G, Lace B, Rousseau J, Ajeawung NF, Kamei A, Minase G, Akasaka M, Araya N, Koshimizu E, van den Ende J, Erger F, Altmüller J, Krumina Z, Strautmanis J, Inashkina I, Stavusis J, El-Gharbawy A, Sebastian J, Puri RD, Kulshrestha S, Verma IC, Maier EM, Haack TB, Israni A, Baptista J, Gunning A, Rosenfeld JA, Liu P, Joosten M, Rocha ME, Hashem MO, Aldhalaan HM, Alkuraya FS, Miyatake S, Matsumoto N, Krawitz PM, Rossignol E, Kinoshita T, Campeau PM. Mutations in PIGB Cause an Inherited GPI Biosynthesis Defect with an Axonal Neuropathy and Metabolic Abnormality in Severe Cases. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 1;105(2):384-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed PMID: 31256876.
2)

Fohlen M, Dorfmüller G, Ferrand-Sorbets S, Dorison N, Chipaux M, Taussig D. Parasagittal hemispherotomy in hemispheric polymicrogyria with electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep: Indications, results and follow-up. Seizure. 2019 Jul 23;71:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.07.017. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31386962.

Mesial temporal lobe lesion approaches

Mesial temporal lobe lesion approaches

There are several ways to safely access mesial temporal structures. The transsylvian-transcisternal approach is a good way to access the mesial structures while preserving the lateral and basal temporal structures. Actual lesions associated with epileptogenesis in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) may be larger than they appear on magnetic resonance imaging. For this reason, evaluations to locate sufficient epileptogenic foci, including invasive studies, should be completed for FCD, and epilepsy surgery should be performed according to these results. Regardless, the ultimate goal of all epilepsy surgeries is to maximize seizure control while maintaining neurological function. Therefore, a tailored approach based on the properties of the lesion is needed1).

For Campero et al., dividing the mesial temporal region (MTR) into 3 regions allows us to adapt the approach to lesion location. Thus, the anterior sector can be approached via the sylvian fissure, the middle sector can be approached transtemporally, and the posterior sector can be approached via the supracerebellar approach 2).

There are limited reports on the transcortical approach for the resection of tumors within this region.

Morshed et al., from the UCSF Medical Center, described the technical considerations and functional outcomes in patients undergoing transcortical resection of gliomas of the mesial temporal lobe (MTL).

Patients with a glioma (WHO grades I-IV) located within the MTL who had undergone the transcortical approach in the period between 1998 and 2016 were identified through the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) tumor registry and were classified according to tumor location: preuncus, uncus, hippocampus/parahippocampus, and various combinations of the former groups. Patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes were determined from operative, radiology, pathology, and other clinical reports that were available through the UCSF electronic medical record.

Fifty patients with low- or high grade glioma were identified. The mean patient age was 46.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 3 years. Seizures were the presenting symptom in 82% of cases. Schramm classification types A, C, and D represented 34%, 28%, and 38% of the tumors, and the majority of lesions were located at least in part within the hippocampus/parahippocampus. For preuncus and preuncus/uncus tumors, a transcortical approach through the temporal pole allowed for resection. For most tumors of the uncus and those extending into the hippocampus/parahippocampus, a corticectomy was performed within the middle and/or inferior temporal gyri to approach the lesion. To locate the safest corridor for the corticectomy, language mapping was performed in 96.9% of the left-sided tumor cases, and subcortical motor mapping was performed in 52% of all cases. The mean volumetric extent of resection of low- and high-grade tumors was 89.5% and 96.0%, respectively, and did not differ by tumor location or Schramm type. By 3 months’ follow-up, 12 patients (24%) had residual deficits, most of which were visual field deficits. Three patients with left-sided tumors (9.4% of dominant-cortex lesions) experienced word-finding difficulty at 3 months after resection, but 2 of these patients demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms by 1 year.

Mesial temporal lobe gliomas, including larger Schramm type C and D tumors, can be safely and aggressively resected via a transcortical equatorial approach when used in conjunction with cortical and subcortical mapping 3).


Microsurgery was performed via transsylviantranstemporal, or subtemporal approaches on 62 patients with mesial temporal lobe gliomas, 33 with localized tumors within the mesial temporal structures (type A), 19 in anterior portion (type A1), and 14 extending to posterior portion (type A2); 19 patients with multicompartmental tumors involving the mesial temporal lobe, insular lobe, and posterior frontorbital gurus (type B); 14 patients with tumors involving the temporal pole and lateral areas of the temporal horn (type C); and 6 patients with tumors infiltrating the brain stem, basal nuclei and thalamus (type D).

Trans-sylvian approach was performed in 25 cases of which total tumor removal was achieved in 14 cases, subtotal removal in 6 cases, and gross removal in 5 cases. Primary visual deficits worsened after surgery in 5 cases. Trans-temporal approach was used in 23 cases of which total tumor resection was achieved in 15 cases, subtotal resection in 5 cases, and gross resection in 3 cases. Primary visual deficits worsened after surgery in 5 cases. Four patients in which preoperative vision were good presented with visual deficits postoperatively. Subtemporal approach was used in 14 cases of which total tumor removal was achieved in 10 cases, and subtotal removal in 4 cases. All 14 patients did not develop worsened vision after surgery.

Trans-sylvian and subtemporal approaches can reduce possible harm to parenchyma and optic radiation, whereas approaches to the temporal horn through the superior and middle temporal gyri will induce damage to parenchyma and optic radiation 4).


The aim of Faust et al., was to categorize temporal lobe tumors based on anatomical, functional, and vascular considerations and to devise a systematic field manual of surgical approaches.

Tumors were classified into four main types with assigned approaches: Type I-lateral: transcortical; type II-polar: pterional/transcortical; type III-central: transsylvian/transopercular; type IV-mesial: transsylvian/trans-cisternal if more anterior (=Type IV A), and supratentorial/infraoccipital if more posterior (=type IV B). 105 patients have been operated on prospectively using the advocated guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated.

Systematic application of the proposed classification facilitated a tailored approach, with gross total tumor resection of 88 %. Neurological and surgical morbidity were less than 10 %. The proposed classification may prove a valuable tool for surgical planning 5).


Twenty formalin-fixed, adult cadaveric specimens were studied. Ten brains provided measurements to compare different surgical strategies. Approaches were demonstrated using 10 silicon-injected cadaveric heads. Surgical cases were used to illustrate the results by the different approaches. Transverse lines at the level of the inferior choroidal point and quadrigeminal plate were used to divide the medial temporal region into anterior, middle, and posterior portions. Surgical approaches to the medial temporal region were classified into four groups: superior, lateral, basal, and medial, based on the surface of the lobe through which the approach was directed. The approaches through the medial group were subdivided further into an anterior approach, the transsylvian transcisternal approach, and two posterior approaches, the occipital interhemispheric and supracerebellar transtentorial approaches.

The anterior portion of the medial temporal region can be reached through the superior, lateral, and basal surfaces of the lobe and the anterior variant of the approach through the medial surface. The posterior group of approaches directed through the medial surface are useful for lesions located in the posterior portion. The middle part of the medial temporal region is the most challenging area to expose, where the approach must be tailored according to the nature of the lesion and its extension to other medial temporal areas.

Each approach to medial temporal lesions has technical or functional drawbacks that should be considered when selecting a surgical treatment for a given patient. Dividing the medial temporal region into smaller areas allows for a more precise analysis, not only of the expected anatomic relationships, but also of the possible choices for the safe resection of the lesion. The systematization used here also provides the basis for selection of a combination of approaches 6).


Germano described a transsulcal temporal approach to mesiotemporal lesions and its application in three patients. Gross-total resection of the lesion was accomplished in all cases. An anatomical cadaveric study was also performed to delineate the microsurgical anatomy of this approach. Precise knowledge of temporal intraventricular landmarks allows navigation to the lesion without the need for a navigational system. This approach is helpful for neurologically intact patients with mesiotemporal lesions 7).

References

1)

Chong S, Phi JH, Lee JY, Kim SK. Surgical Treatment of Lesional Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Epilepsy Res. 2018 Jun 30;8(1):6-11. doi: 10.14581/jer.18002. eCollection 2018 Jun. Review. PubMed PMID: 30090756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6066696.
2)

Campero A, Ajler P, Rica C, Rhoton A Jr. Cavernomas and Arteriovenous Malformations in the Mesial Temporal Region: Microsurgical Anatomy and Approaches. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Feb 1;13(1):113-123. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001239. PubMed PMID: 28931254.
3)

Morshed RA, Young JS, Han SJ, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. The transcortical equatorial approach for gliomas of the mesial temporal lobe: techniques and functional outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 20:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS172055. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29676697.
4)

Jiang ZL, Wang ZC, Jiang T. [Surgical outcomes of different approaches for mesial temporal lobe gliomas]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Sep 7;85(34):2428-32. Chinese. PubMed PMID: 16321253.
5)

Faust K, Schmiedek P, Vajkoczy P. Approaches to temporal lobe lesions: a proposal for classification. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):409-13. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1917-4. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Review. PubMed PMID: 24201756.
6)

Campero A, Tróccoli G, Martins C, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Yasuda A, Rhoton AL Jr. Microsurgical approaches to the medial temporal region: an anatomical study. Neurosurgery. 2006 Oct;59(4 Suppl 2):ONS279-307; discussion ONS307-8. PubMed PMID: 17041498.
7)

Germano IM. Transsulcal approach to mesiotemporal lesions. Anatomy, technique, and report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus. 1996 Nov 15;1(5):e4. PubMed PMID: 15099055.
WhatsApp WhatsApp us
%d bloggers like this: