Percutaneous foramen ovale puncture

Percutaneous Foramen Ovale Puncture

Foramen ovale (FO) puncture allows percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy, Foramen ovale electrode placement, and selected biopsy studies.

Balloon compression of the gasserian ganglion has been a well-established percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia since the 1980s. However, puncture of the foramen ovale by conventional single-plane fluoroscopy can be difficult in cases of local anatomic abnormalities.

Mendes et al. presented the case of a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia refractory to pharmacological treatment. After failure of puncture by conventional fluoroscopy for percutaneous gasserian ganglion balloon compression due to a narrow foramen ovale, the patient was submitted to puncture guided by computed tomography.

Alternative imaging methods, such as computed tomography, should be considered when Percutaneous Foramen Ovale Puncture by conventional single-plane fluoroscopy fails, to minimize the risk of potential complications triggered by frustrated puncture attempts 1).

Complications

Although Gasserian ganglion block is an established treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, the foramen ovale cannot always be clearly visualized by classical X-ray radiography.

Cannulation procedures, including those utilizing neuronavigational technology, are occasionally complicated by anatomical variation of the FO, sometimes resulting in miscannulation and subsequent adverse events. The FO, while commonly thought of as oval-shaped, has also been described as “almond,” “banana,” “D shape,” “pear,” and “triangular.” 2).

Advancement of the catheter more than 10 mm from the foramen ovale is likely to damage the internal carotid artery and the abducens nerve at the medial side of the petrolingual ligament. Thermocoagulation of the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus may damage the cranial nerves by heat, giving rise to pareses 3).


Guo et al., described a technique that includes a stereotactic approach in the preoperative plan in cases where the foramen ovale is difficult to access for radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion.

The study included 395 patients for whom three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction of the skull base, maxilla, and mandible was conducted before surgery. Accessibility of the foramen ovale was defined using numerical data from the three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction images. In those patients for whom accessibility of the foramen ovale was considered difficult, the authors used a stereotactic frame to design an individual operative plan. Adjustments of a single point of data,-that is, a change in X axis, Y axis, or an arc angle-were guided by radiographic fluoroscopy images. After verifying successful cannulation and electroneurophysiology, thermocoagulation targets-especially multiple targets recorded as data on the Z axis of the stereotactic approach-were identified and treated.

There were 24 patients who met the predetermined criteria for having a difficult-to-access foramen ovales-that is, they had at least two contributing factors and/or involvement of division V1 . Twenty-one of the 24 patients required a single satisfactory puncture; three patients required two to three punctures to successfully access the foramen ovale. There were no permanent complications from the procedure.

The authors conclude that this stereotactic approach combined with three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction model can improve the accuracy, safety, and efficiency of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation in patients with trigeminal neuralgia for whom the foramen ovale is difficult to access 4).


Ding et al., assessed the feasibility of accessing the Gasserian ganglion through the FO from a mandibular angle under computed tomography (CT) and neuronavigation guidance.A total of 108 patients with TN were randomly divided into 2 groups (Group G and Group H) using a random number table. In Group H, anterior Hartel approach was used to puncture the FO; whereas in Group G, a percutaneous puncture through a mandibular angle was used to reach the FO. In both groups, procedures were guided by CT imaging and neuronavigation. The success rates, therapeutic effects, complications, and recurrence rates of the 2 groups were compared.The puncture success rates in Group H and Group G were 52/54 (96.30%) and 49/54 (90.74%), respectively (P = 0.24). The 2 procedural failures in Group H were rescued by using submandibular trajectory, and the 5 failures in Group G were successfully reapproached by Hartel method. Therapeutic effects as measured by Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Scale (P = 0.03) and quality of life (QOL) scores (P = 0.04) were significantly better in Group G than those in Group H at 36 months posttreatment. Hematoma developed in 1/54 (1.85%) cases in Group H, and no cases of hematoma were observed in Group G (P = 0.33). In Group H, RFT resulted in injury to the unintended trigeminal nerve branches and motor fibers in 27/52 (51.92%) cases; in Group G, it resulted in the same type of injury in 7/49 cases (14.29%) (P < 0.01). In Group H, the 24- and 36-month recurrence rates were 12/51 (23.53%) and 20/51 (39.22%), respectively; in Group G, these recurrence rates were 7/49 (12.24%) and 9/49 (16.33%, P = 0.03), respectively.CT- and neuronavigation-guided puncture from a mandibular angle through the FO into the Gasserian ganglion can be safely and effectively used to deliver RFT for the treatment of pTN. This method may represent a viable option to treat TN in addition to Hartel approach 5).


The goals of a study of Peris-Celda et al., were to demonstrate the anatomical basis of complications related to FO puncture, and provide anatomical landmarks for improvement of safety, selective lesioning of the trigeminal nerve (TN), and optimal placement of electrodes.

Both sides of 50 dry skulls were studied to obtain the distances from the FO to relevant cranial base references. A total of 36 sides from 18 formalin-fixed specimens were dissected for Meckel cave and TN measurements. The best radiographic projection for FO visualization was assessed in 40 skulls, and the optimal trajectory angles, insertion depths, and topographies of the lesions were evaluated in 17 specimens. In addition, the differences in postoperative pain relief after the radiofrequency procedure among different branches of the TN were statistically assessed in 49 patients to determine if there was any TN branch less efficiently targeted.

Most severe complications during FO puncture are related to incorrect needle placement intracranially or extracranially. The needle should be inserted 25 mm lateral to the oral commissure, forming an approximately 45° angle with the hard palate in the lateral radiographic view, directed 20° medially in the anteroposterior view. Once the needle reaches the FO, it can be advanced by 20 mm, on average, up to the petrous ridge. If the needle/radiofrequency electrode tip remains more than 18 mm away from the midline, injury to the cavernous carotid artery is minimized. Anatomically there is less potential for complications when the needle/radiofrequency electrode is advanced no more than 2 mm away from the clival line in the lateral view, when the needle pierces the medial part of the FO toward the medial part of the trigeminal impression in the petrous ridge, and no more than 4 mm in the lateral part. The 40°/45° inferior transfacial-20° oblique radiographic projection visualized 96.2% of the FOs in dry skulls, and the remainder were not visualized in any other projection of the radiograph. Patients with V1 involvement experienced postoperative pain more frequently than did patients with V2 or V3 involvement. Anatomical targeting of V1 in specimens was more efficiently achieved by inserting the needle in the medial third of the FO; for V2 targeting, in the middle of the FO; and for V3 targeting, in the lateral third of the FO.

Knowledge of the extracranial and intracranial anatomical relationships of the FO is essential to understanding and avoiding complications during FO puncture. These data suggest that better radiographic visualization of the FO can improve lesioning accuracy depending on the part of the FO to be punctured. The angles and safety distances obtained may help the neurosurgeon minimize complications during FO puncture and TN lesioning 6).


Koizuka et al., presented a new method for percutaneous radio-frequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion, in which computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy is used to guide needle placement.

In the present study, 15 patients with trigeminal neuralgia underwent percutaneous radio-frequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion guided by high-speed real-time CT fluoroscopy.

RESULTS: Trigeminal neuralgia was improved in all patients after treatment without any severe complications. Moderate dysesthesia occurred in only one case.

CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous radio-frequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion was safe, quick, and effective for patients with intractable idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia 7).

Videos

References

1)

Mendes PD, Martins da Cunha PH, Monteiro KKO, Quites LV, Fonseca Filho GA. Percutaneous Foramen Ovale Puncture: Usefulness of Intraoperative CT Control, in the Eventuality of a Narrow Foramen [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 16]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;1-4. doi:10.1159/000509821
2)

Zdilla MJ, Fijalkowski KM. The Shape of the Foramen Ovale: A Visualization Aid for Cannulation Procedures. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Dec 23. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003325. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28027173.
3)

Kaplan M, Erol FS, Ozveren MF, Topsakal C, Sam B, Tekdemir I. Review of complications due to foramen ovale puncture. J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Jun;14(6):563-8. Epub 2006 Dec 13. PubMed PMID: 17169562.
4)

Guo Z, Wu B, Du C, Cheng M, Tian Y. Stereotactic Approach Combined with 3D CT Reconstruction for Difficult-to-Access Foramen Ovale on Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of the Gasserian Ganglion for Trigeminal Neuralgia. Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1704-16. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv108. Epub 2016 Feb 13. PubMed PMID: 26874883.
5)

Ding W, Chen S, Wang R, Cai J, Cheng Y, Yu L, Li Q, Deng F, Zhu S, Yu W. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for trigeminal neuralgia using neuronavigation-guided puncture from a mandibular angle. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e4940. PubMed PMID: 27749549; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5059051.
6)

Peris-Celda M, Graziano F, Russo V, Mericle RA, Ulm AJ. Foramen ovale puncture, lesioning accuracy, and avoiding complications: microsurgical anatomy study with clinical implications. J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1176-93. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS12743. Epub 2013 Apr 19. PubMed PMID: 23600929.
7)

Koizuka S, Saito S, Sekimoto K, Tobe M, Obata H, Koyama Y. Percutaneous radio-frequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion guided by high-speed real-time CT fluoroscopy. Neuroradiology. 2009 Sep;51(9):563-6. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0541-8. Epub 2009 Jun 5. PubMed PMID: 19499214.

IntuitivePlan

IntuitivePlan

http://www.intuitivetherapeutics.com/index.php/en/


Levivier et al. developed a new, real-time interactive inverse planning approach, based on a fully convex framework, to be used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

The convex framework is based on the precomputation of a dictionary composed of the individual dose distributions of all possible shots, considering all their possible locations, sizes, and shapes inside the target volume. The convex problem is solved to determine the plan, i.e., which shots and with which weights, that will actually be used, considering a sparsity constraint on the shots to fulfill the constraints while minimizing the beam-on time. The system is called IntuitivePlan and allows data to be transferred from generated dose plans into the Gamma Knife treatment planning software for further dosimetry evaluation.

The system has been very efficiently implemented, and an optimal plan is usually obtained in less than 1 to 2 minutes, depending on the complexity of the problem, on a desktop computer or in only a few minutes on a high-end laptop. Dosimetry data from 5 cases, 2 meningiomas and 3 vestibular schwannomas, were generated with IntuitivePlan. Results of evaluation of the dosimetry characteristics are very satisfactory and adequate in terms of conformity, selectivity, gradient, protection of organs at risk, and treatment time.

The possibility of using optimal, interactive real-time inverse planning in conjunction with the Leksell Gamma Knife opens new perspectives in radiosurgery, especially considering the potential use of the full capabilities of the latest generations of the Leksell Gamma Knife. This approach gives new users the possibility of using the system for easier and quicker access to good-quality plans with a shorter technical training period and opens avenues for new planning strategies for expert users. The use of a convex optimization approach allows an optimal plan to be provided in a very short processing time. This way, innovative graphical user interfaces can be developed, allowing the user to interact directly with the planning system to graphically define the desired dose map and to modify on-the-fly the dose map by moving, in a very user-friendly manner, the isodose surfaces of an initial plan. Further independent quantitative prospective evaluation comparing inverse planned and forward planned cases is warranted to validate this novel and promising treatment planning approach 1).


To compare planning indices achieved using manual and inverse planning approaches for Gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation.

For a series of consecutive AVM patients, treatment plans were manually created by expert planners using Leksell GammaPlan (LGP). Patients were re-planned using a new commercially released inverse planning system, IntuitivePlan. Plan quality metrics were calculated for both groups of plans and compared.

Overall, IntuitivePlan created treatment plans of similar quality to expert planners. For some plan quality metrics statistically significant higher scores were achieved for the inversely generated plans (Coverage 96.8% vs 96.3%, P = 0.027; PCI 0.855 vs 0.824, P = 0.042), but others did not show statistically significant differences (Selectivity 0.884 vs 0.856, P = 0.071; GI 2.85 vs 2.76, P = 0.096; Efficiency Index 47.0% vs 48.1%, P = 0.242; Normal Brain V12 (cc) 5.81 vs 5.79, P = 0.497). Automatic inverse planning demonstrated significantly shorter planning times over manual planning (3.79 vs 11.58 min, P < 10-6 ) and greater numbers of isocentres (40.4 vs 10.8, P < 10-6 ), with an associated cost of longer treatment times (57.97 vs 49.52 min, P = 0.009). When planning and treatment time were combined, there was no significant difference in the overall time between the two methods (61.76 vs 61.10, P = 0.433).

IntuitivePlan can offer savings on the labor of treatment planning. In many cases, it achieves higher quality indices than those achieved by an “expert planner” 2).

References

1)

Levivier M, Carrillo RE, Charrier R, Martin A, Thiran JP. A real-time optimal inverse planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery by convex optimization: description of the system and first dosimetry data. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(Suppl1):111-117. doi:10.3171/2018.7.GKS181572
2)

Paddick I, Grishchuk D, Dimitriadis A. IntuitivePlan inverse planning performance evaluation for Gamma Knife radiosurgery of AVMs [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 4]. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;10.1002/acm2.12973. doi:10.1002/acm2.12973

Intraoperative Ultrasound for Spine Surgery

Intraoperative Ultrasound for Spine Surgery

Accurate and efficient registration of pre-operative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images with iUS images are key elements in the success of iUS-based spine navigation. While widely investigated in research, iUS-based spine navigation has not yet been established in the clinic. This is due to several factors including the lack of a standard methodology for the assessment of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability of the registration method. To address these issues, Gueziri et al. presented a systematic review of the state-of-the-art techniques for iUS-guided registration in spinal image guided surgery (IGS). The review follows a new taxonomy based on the four steps involved in the surgical workflow that include pre-processing, registration initialization, estimation of the required patient to image transformation, and a visualization process. They provided a detailed analysis of the measurements in terms of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability that need to be met during the evaluation of a spinal IGS framework. Although this review is focused on spinal navigation, they expect similar evaluation criteria to be relevant for other IGS applications 1).


Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) has been applied in spinal surgery for all kinds of diseases 2) 3) ranging from trauma, 4) degenerative diseases, 5) 6) developmental malformations, 7) vascular diseases, 8). to imaging in spinal tumor surgery

Intraoperative Ultrasound for spinal tumor surgery

Intraoperative Ultrasound for spinal tumor surgery

Syringomyelia

Intraoperative ultrasound is often helpful for:

a) localizing the cyst

b) assessing for septations (to avoid shunting only part of cyst)

Controversial,for intramedullary spinal cord tumors 9) favored by some experts. Astrocytomas are usually iso-echoic with the spinal cord, whereas ependymomas are usually hyperechoic.

Transpedicular thoracic discectomy

Intraoperative ultrasound is a simple yet valuable tool for real-time imaging during transpedicular thoracic discectomy. Visualization provided by intraoperative US increases the safety profile of posterior approaches and may make thoracotomy unnecessary in a selected group of patients, especially when a patient has existing pulmonary disease or is otherwise not medically fit for the transthoracic approach 10) 11).

References

1)

Gueziri HE, Santaguida C, Collins DL. The state-of-the-art in ultrasound-guided spine interventions [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 26]. Med Image Anal. 2020;65:101769. doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101769
2)

Ganau M, Syrmos N, Martin AR, Jiang F, Fehlings MG. Intraoperative ultrasound in spine surgery: history, current applications, future developments. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8: 261-267.
3)

Vasudeva VS, Abd-El-Barr M, Pompeu YA, Karhade A, Groff MW, Lu Y. Use of intraoperative ultrasound during spinal surgery. Glob Spine J. 2017;7:648-656.
4)

Meinig H, Doffert J, Linz N, Konerding MA, Gercek E, Pitzen T. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in spinal trauma in 29 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:864-870.
5)

Nishimura Y, Thani NB, Tochigi S, Ahn H, Ginsberg HJ. Thoracic discectomy by posterior pedicle-sparing, transfacet approach with realtime intraoperative ultrasonography: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:568-576.
6)

Goodkin R, Haynor DR, Kliot M. Intraoperative ultrasound for monitoring anterior cervical vertebrectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1996;84: 702-704.
7)

. Cui LG, Jiang L, Zhang HB, et al. Monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid flow by intraoperative ultrasound in patients with Chiari I malformation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113:173-176.
8)

Prada F, Del Bene M, Farago G, DiMeco F. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: is there a role for intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound? World Neurosurg. 2017;100:712.e15-712.e18.
9)

Albright AL. Pediatric Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999; 15:436–437
10)

Tan LA, Lopes DK, Fontes RB. Ultrasound-guided posterolateral approach for midline calcified thoracic disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Jun;55(6):383-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.6.383. Epub 2014 Jun 30. PubMed PMID:25237439.
11)

Nishimura Y, Thani NB, Tochigi S, Ahn H, Ginsberg HJ. Thoracic discectomy by posterior pedicle-sparing, transfacet approach with real-time intraoperative ultrasonography. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul 18:1-9. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25036220.
WhatsApp WhatsApp us
%d bloggers like this: