Temporal epidural hematoma surgical technique

Temporal epidural hematoma surgical technique

Surgical safety checklist

Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

Skin Preparation

Positioning

The supine position is used with the patient‘s head rotated for temporal access. Extremes of head rotation can obstruct the jugular venous drainage, and a shoulder roll can combat this problem or lateral positioning (park bench position).

Skin incision

Craniotomy

Technical issues

1. clot removal: lowers ICP and eliminates focal mass effect. Blood is usually thick coagulum, thus exposure must provide access to most of clot. Craniotomy permits more complete evacuation of hematoma than e.g. burr holes.

2. hemostasis:coagulate bleeding soft tissue (dural veins & arteries). Apply bone wax to intradiploic bleeders (e.g. middle meningeal artery). Also requires large exposure

3. prevent reaccumulation: (some bleeding may recur, and dura is now detached from inner table) place dural tack-up sutures to edges of craniotomy and use central “tenting” suture.

Mesial temporal lobe lesion approaches

Mesial temporal lobe lesion approaches

There are several ways to safely access mesial temporal structures. The transsylvian-transcisternal approach is a good way to access the mesial structures while preserving the lateral and basal temporal structures. Actual lesions associated with epileptogenesis in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) may be larger than they appear on magnetic resonance imaging. For this reason, evaluations to locate sufficient epileptogenic foci, including invasive studies, should be completed for FCD, and epilepsy surgery should be performed according to these results. Regardless, the ultimate goal of all epilepsy surgeries is to maximize seizure control while maintaining neurological function. Therefore, a tailored approach based on the properties of the lesion is needed1).

For Campero et al., dividing the mesial temporal region (MTR) into 3 regions allows us to adapt the approach to lesion location. Thus, the anterior sector can be approached via the sylvian fissure, the middle sector can be approached transtemporally, and the posterior sector can be approached via the supracerebellar approach 2).

There are limited reports on the transcortical approach for the resection of tumors within this region.

Morshed et al., from the UCSF Medical Center, described the technical considerations and functional outcomes in patients undergoing transcortical resection of gliomas of the mesial temporal lobe (MTL).

Patients with a glioma (WHO grades I-IV) located within the MTL who had undergone the transcortical approach in the period between 1998 and 2016 were identified through the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) tumor registry and were classified according to tumor location: preuncus, uncus, hippocampus/parahippocampus, and various combinations of the former groups. Patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes were determined from operative, radiology, pathology, and other clinical reports that were available through the UCSF electronic medical record.

Fifty patients with low- or high grade glioma were identified. The mean patient age was 46.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 3 years. Seizures were the presenting symptom in 82% of cases. Schramm classification types A, C, and D represented 34%, 28%, and 38% of the tumors, and the majority of lesions were located at least in part within the hippocampus/parahippocampus. For preuncus and preuncus/uncus tumors, a transcortical approach through the temporal pole allowed for resection. For most tumors of the uncus and those extending into the hippocampus/parahippocampus, a corticectomy was performed within the middle and/or inferior temporal gyri to approach the lesion. To locate the safest corridor for the corticectomy, language mapping was performed in 96.9% of the left-sided tumor cases, and subcortical motor mapping was performed in 52% of all cases. The mean volumetric extent of resection of low- and high-grade tumors was 89.5% and 96.0%, respectively, and did not differ by tumor location or Schramm type. By 3 months’ follow-up, 12 patients (24%) had residual deficits, most of which were visual field deficits. Three patients with left-sided tumors (9.4% of dominant-cortex lesions) experienced word-finding difficulty at 3 months after resection, but 2 of these patients demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms by 1 year.

Mesial temporal lobe gliomas, including larger Schramm type C and D tumors, can be safely and aggressively resected via a transcortical equatorial approach when used in conjunction with cortical and subcortical mapping 3).


Microsurgery was performed via transsylviantranstemporal, or subtemporal approaches on 62 patients with mesial temporal lobe gliomas, 33 with localized tumors within the mesial temporal structures (type A), 19 in anterior portion (type A1), and 14 extending to posterior portion (type A2); 19 patients with multicompartmental tumors involving the mesial temporal lobe, insular lobe, and posterior frontorbital gurus (type B); 14 patients with tumors involving the temporal pole and lateral areas of the temporal horn (type C); and 6 patients with tumors infiltrating the brain stem, basal nuclei and thalamus (type D).

Trans-sylvian approach was performed in 25 cases of which total tumor removal was achieved in 14 cases, subtotal removal in 6 cases, and gross removal in 5 cases. Primary visual deficits worsened after surgery in 5 cases. Trans-temporal approach was used in 23 cases of which total tumor resection was achieved in 15 cases, subtotal resection in 5 cases, and gross resection in 3 cases. Primary visual deficits worsened after surgery in 5 cases. Four patients in which preoperative vision were good presented with visual deficits postoperatively. Subtemporal approach was used in 14 cases of which total tumor removal was achieved in 10 cases, and subtotal removal in 4 cases. All 14 patients did not develop worsened vision after surgery.

Trans-sylvian and subtemporal approaches can reduce possible harm to parenchyma and optic radiation, whereas approaches to the temporal horn through the superior and middle temporal gyri will induce damage to parenchyma and optic radiation 4).


The aim of Faust et al., was to categorize temporal lobe tumors based on anatomical, functional, and vascular considerations and to devise a systematic field manual of surgical approaches.

Tumors were classified into four main types with assigned approaches: Type I-lateral: transcortical; type II-polar: pterional/transcortical; type III-central: transsylvian/transopercular; type IV-mesial: transsylvian/trans-cisternal if more anterior (=Type IV A), and supratentorial/infraoccipital if more posterior (=type IV B). 105 patients have been operated on prospectively using the advocated guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated.

Systematic application of the proposed classification facilitated a tailored approach, with gross total tumor resection of 88 %. Neurological and surgical morbidity were less than 10 %. The proposed classification may prove a valuable tool for surgical planning 5).


Twenty formalin-fixed, adult cadaveric specimens were studied. Ten brains provided measurements to compare different surgical strategies. Approaches were demonstrated using 10 silicon-injected cadaveric heads. Surgical cases were used to illustrate the results by the different approaches. Transverse lines at the level of the inferior choroidal point and quadrigeminal plate were used to divide the medial temporal region into anterior, middle, and posterior portions. Surgical approaches to the medial temporal region were classified into four groups: superior, lateral, basal, and medial, based on the surface of the lobe through which the approach was directed. The approaches through the medial group were subdivided further into an anterior approach, the transsylvian transcisternal approach, and two posterior approaches, the occipital interhemispheric and supracerebellar transtentorial approaches.

The anterior portion of the medial temporal region can be reached through the superior, lateral, and basal surfaces of the lobe and the anterior variant of the approach through the medial surface. The posterior group of approaches directed through the medial surface are useful for lesions located in the posterior portion. The middle part of the medial temporal region is the most challenging area to expose, where the approach must be tailored according to the nature of the lesion and its extension to other medial temporal areas.

Each approach to medial temporal lesions has technical or functional drawbacks that should be considered when selecting a surgical treatment for a given patient. Dividing the medial temporal region into smaller areas allows for a more precise analysis, not only of the expected anatomic relationships, but also of the possible choices for the safe resection of the lesion. The systematization used here also provides the basis for selection of a combination of approaches 6).


Germano described a transsulcal temporal approach to mesiotemporal lesions and its application in three patients. Gross-total resection of the lesion was accomplished in all cases. An anatomical cadaveric study was also performed to delineate the microsurgical anatomy of this approach. Precise knowledge of temporal intraventricular landmarks allows navigation to the lesion without the need for a navigational system. This approach is helpful for neurologically intact patients with mesiotemporal lesions 7).

References

1)

Chong S, Phi JH, Lee JY, Kim SK. Surgical Treatment of Lesional Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Epilepsy Res. 2018 Jun 30;8(1):6-11. doi: 10.14581/jer.18002. eCollection 2018 Jun. Review. PubMed PMID: 30090756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6066696.
2)

Campero A, Ajler P, Rica C, Rhoton A Jr. Cavernomas and Arteriovenous Malformations in the Mesial Temporal Region: Microsurgical Anatomy and Approaches. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Feb 1;13(1):113-123. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001239. PubMed PMID: 28931254.
3)

Morshed RA, Young JS, Han SJ, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. The transcortical equatorial approach for gliomas of the mesial temporal lobe: techniques and functional outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 20:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS172055. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29676697.
4)

Jiang ZL, Wang ZC, Jiang T. [Surgical outcomes of different approaches for mesial temporal lobe gliomas]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Sep 7;85(34):2428-32. Chinese. PubMed PMID: 16321253.
5)

Faust K, Schmiedek P, Vajkoczy P. Approaches to temporal lobe lesions: a proposal for classification. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):409-13. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1917-4. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Review. PubMed PMID: 24201756.
6)

Campero A, Tróccoli G, Martins C, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Yasuda A, Rhoton AL Jr. Microsurgical approaches to the medial temporal region: an anatomical study. Neurosurgery. 2006 Oct;59(4 Suppl 2):ONS279-307; discussion ONS307-8. PubMed PMID: 17041498.
7)

Germano IM. Transsulcal approach to mesiotemporal lesions. Anatomy, technique, and report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus. 1996 Nov 15;1(5):e4. PubMed PMID: 15099055.

Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL)

Anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal sclerosis is a very effective measure to control seizures, and the probability of being seizure-free is approximately 70-90%. However, 30% of patients still experience seizures after surgery.

In neurosurgery there are several situations that require transgression of the temporal cortex. For example, a subset of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy require surgical resection (most typically, en-bloc anterior temporal lobectomy). This procedure is the gold standard to alleviate seizures but is associated with chronic cognitive deficits. In recent years there have been multiple attempts to find the optimum balance between minimising the size of resection in order to preserve cognitive function, while still ensuring seizure freedom. Some attempts involve reducing the distance that the resection stretches back from the temporal pole, whilst others try to preserve one or more of the temporal gyri. More recent advanced surgical techniques (selective amygdalohippocampectomy) try to remove the least amount of tissue by going under (sub-temporal), over (trans-Sylvian) or through the temporal lobe (middle-temporal), which have been related to better cognitive outcomes. Previous comparisons of these surgical techniques focus on comparing seizure freedom or behaviour post-surgery, however there have been no systematic studies showing the effect of surgery on white matter connectivity. The main aim of this study, therefore, was to perform systematic ‘pseudo-neurosurgery’ based on existing resection methods on healthy neuroimaging data and measuring the effect on long-range connectivity. We use anatomical connectivity maps (ACM) to determine long-range disconnection, which is complementary to existing measures of local integrity such as fractional anisotropy or mean diffusivity. ACMs were generated for each diffusion scan in order to compare whole-brain connectivity with an ‘ideal resection’, nine anterior temporal lobectomy and three selective approaches. For en-bloc resections, as distance from the temporal pole increased, reduction in connectivity was evident within the arcuate fasciculusinferior longitudinal fasciculusinferior frontooccipital fascicle, and the uncinate fasciculus. Increasing the height of resections dorsally reduced connectivity within the uncinate fasciculus. Sub-temporal amygdalohippocampectomy resections were associated with connectivity patterns most similar to the ‘ideal’ baseline resection, compared to trans-Sylvian and middle-temporal approaches. In conclusion, we showed the utility of ACM in assessing long-range disconnections/disruptions during temporal lobe resections, where we identified the subtemporal resection as the least disruptive to long-range connectivity which may explain its better cognitive outcome. These results have a direct impact on understanding the amount and/or type of cognitive deficit post-surgery, which may not be obtainable using local measures of white matter integrity 1).

Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) with amygdalohippocampectomy (ATLAH) has been shown to be more efficacious than continued medical therapy in a randomized, controlled trial 2).

Minimally invasive approaches to treating MTLE might achieve seizure freedom while minimizing adverse effects.

Anterior temporal lobectomy as described by Penfield and Baldwin 3). is the most established neurosurgical procedure for temporal lobe epilepsy, for those in whom anticonvulsant medications do not control epileptic seizures.

It consists in the complete removal of the anterior portion of the temporal lobe of the brain.

Knowledge of the temporomesial region, including neurovascular structures around the brainstem, is essential to keep this procedure safe and effective 4).

The techniques for removing temporal lobe tissue vary from resection of large amounts of tissue, including lateral temporal cortex along with medial structures, to more restricted anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) to more restricted removal of only the medial structures (selective amygdalohippocampectomy, SAH).

Limits of resection

The measurements are made along the middle temporal gyrus.

Dominant temporal lobe: Up to 4-5 cm may be removed

Non Dominant: 6- 7 cm.


Nearly all reports of seizure outcome following these procedures indicate that the best outcome group includes patients with MRI evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis (hippocampal atrophy with increased T-2 signal.) The range of seizure-free outcomes for these patients is reported to be between 80 and 90%, which is typically reported as a sub-set of data within a larger surgical series.

Open surgical procedures such as ATL have inherent risks including damage to the brain (either directly or indirectly by injury to important blood vessels), bleeding (which can require re-operation), blood loss (which can require transfusion), and infection. Furthermore, open procedures require several days of care in the hospital including at least one night in an intensive care unit. Although such treatment can be costly, multiple studies have demonstrated that ATL in patients who have failed at least two anticonvulsant drug trials (thereby meeting the criteria for medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy) has lower mortality, lower morbidity and lower long-term cost in comparison with continued medical therapy without surgical intervention.

The strongest evidence supporting ATL over continued medical therapy for medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy is a prospective, randomized trial of ATL compared to best medical therapy (anticonvulsants), which convincingly demonstrated that the seizure-free rate after surgery was ~ 60% as compared to only 8% for the medicine only group.

Furthermore, there was no mortality in the surgery group, while there was seizure-related mortality in the medical therapy group. Therefore, ATL is considered the standard of care for patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Surgical resection is the gold standard treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, including mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and other focal cortical lesions with correlated electrophysiological features. Anterior temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy (ATLAH) has been shown to be more efficacious than continued medical therapy in a randomized, controlled trial 5).

The most common surgical procedure for the mesial temporal lobe is the standard anterior temporal resection or what is commonly called the anterior temporal lobectomy. There are, however, a number of other more selective procedures for removal of the mesial temporal lobe structures (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus) that spare much of the lateral temporal neocortex. Included in these procedures collectively referred to as selective amygdalohippocampectomy are the transsylvian, subtemporal, and transcortical (trans-middle temporal gyrus) selective amygdalohippocampectomy 6).

The ATL group scored significantly worse for recognition of fear compared with selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) patients. Inversely, after SAH scores for disgust were significantly lower than after ATL, independently of the side of resection. Unilateral temporal damage impairs facial emotion recognition (FER). Different neurosurgical procedures may affect FER differently 7).

Outcome

Functional MRIResting state fMRIdiffusion tensor imaging modalities can be used effectively, in an additive fashion, to predict functional reorganization and cognitive outcome following anterior temporal lobectomy 8).

Complications

Case series

Of 1214 patients evaluated for surgery in the epilepsy Center of Faculdade de Medicina de São Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP), a tertiary Brazilian epilepsy center, 400 underwent ATL for MTS. Number and type of auras was analyzed and compared with Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scalefor outcome.

Analyzing the patients by the type of aura, those who had extratemporal auras had worst result in post-surgical in Engel classifcation. While mesial auras apparently is a good prognostic factor. Patients without aura also had worse prognosis. Simple and multiple aura had no difference. In order to identify the most appropriate candidates for ATL, is very important to consider the prognostic factors associated with favorable for counseling patients in daily practice 9).


Boucher et al. compared preoperative vs. postoperative memory performance in 13 patients with selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) with 26 patients who underwent ATL matched on side of surgery, IQ, age at seizure onset, and age at surgery. Memory function was assessed using the Logical Memory subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scales – 3rd edition (LM-WMS), the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), the Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed opposite effects of SAH and ATL on the two verbal learning memory tests. On the immediate recall trial of the LM-WMS, performance deteriorated after ATL in comparison with that after SAH. By contrast, on the delayed recognition trial of the RAVLT, performance deteriorated after SAH compared with that after ATL. However, additional analyses revealed that the latter finding was only observed when surgery was conducted in the right hemisphere. No interaction effects were found on other memory outcomes. The results are congruent with the view that tasks involving rich semantic content and syntactical structure are more sensitive to the effects of lateral temporal cortex resection as compared with mesiotemporal resection. The findings highlight the importance of task selection in the assessment of memory in patients undergoing TLE surgery10).

References

1)

Busby N, Halai AD, Parker GJM, Coope DJ, Lambon Ralph MA. Mapping whole brain connectivity changes: The potential impact of different surgical resection approaches for temporal lobe epilepsy. Cortex. 2018 Nov 17;113:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.003. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30557759.
2) , 5)

Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(5):311–318.
3)

PENFIELD W, BALDWIN M. Temporal lobe seizures and the technic of subtotal temporal lobectomy. Ann Surg. 1952 Oct;136(4):625-34. PubMed PMID: 12986645; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1803045.
4)

Schaller K, Cabrilo I. Anterior temporal lobectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jan;158(1):161-6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2640-0. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PubMed PMID: 26596998.
6)

Wheatley BM. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy: the trans-middle temporal gyrus approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2008 Sep;25(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/FOC/2008/25/9/E4. Review. PubMed PMID: 18759628.
7)

Wendling AS, Steinhoff BJ, Bodin F, Staack AM, Zentner J, Scholly J, Valenti MP, Schulze-Bonhage A, Hirsch E. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus standard temporal lobectomy in patients with mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis: post-operative facial emotion recognition abilities. Epilepsy Res. 2015 Mar;111:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PubMed PMID: 25769370.
8)

Osipowicz K, Sperling MR, Sharan AD, Tracy JI. Functional MRI, resting state fMRI, and DTI for predicting verbal fluency outcome following resective surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):929-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS131422. Epub 2015 Sep 25. PubMed PMID: 26406797.
9)

da Cruz Adry RAR, Meguins LC, Pereira CU, da Silva Júnior SC, de Araújo Filho GM, Marques LHN. Auras as a prognostic factor in anterior temporal lobe resections for mesial temporal sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Jun 28. doi: 10.1111/ene.13740. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29953714.
10)

Boucher O, Dagenais E, Bouthillier A, Nguyen DK, Rouleau I. Different effects of anterior temporal lobectomy and selective amygdalohippocampectomy on verbal memory performance of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Oct 12;52(Pt A):230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.09.012. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26469799.
× How can I help you?
WhatsApp WhatsApp us
%d bloggers like this: